ðŸŽ‰ Exercism Research is now launched. Help Exercism, help science and have some fun at research.exercism.io ðŸŽ‰

Published at Jul 13 2018
·
3 comments

Instructions

Test suite

Solution

Find the difference between the square of the sum and the sum of the squares of the first N natural numbers.

The square of the sum of the first ten natural numbers is (1 + 2 + ... + 10)Â² = 55Â² = 3025.

The sum of the squares of the first ten natural numbers is 1Â² + 2Â² + ... + 10Â² = 385.

Hence the difference between the square of the sum of the first ten natural numbers and the sum of the squares of the first ten natural numbers is 3025 - 385 = 2640.

For installation and learning resources, refer to the exercism help page.

For running the tests provided, you will need the Minitest gem. Open a terminal window and run the following command to install minitest:

```
gem install minitest
```

If you would like color output, you can `require 'minitest/pride'`

in
the test file, or note the alternative instruction, below, for running
the test file.

Run the tests from the exercise directory using the following command:

```
ruby difference_of_squares_test.rb
```

To include color from the command line:

```
ruby -r minitest/pride difference_of_squares_test.rb
```

Problem 6 at Project Euler http://projecteuler.net/problem=6

It's possible to submit an incomplete solution so you can see how others have completed the exercise.

```
require 'minitest/autorun'
require_relative 'difference_of_squares'
# Common test data version: 1.1.0 7a1108b
class DifferenceOfSquaresTest < Minitest::Test
def test_square_of_sum_1
# skip
assert_equal 1, Squares.new(1).square_of_sum
end
def test_square_of_sum_5
skip
assert_equal 225, Squares.new(5).square_of_sum
end
def test_square_of_sum_100
skip
assert_equal 25_502_500, Squares.new(100).square_of_sum
end
def test_sum_of_squares_1
skip
assert_equal 1, Squares.new(1).sum_of_squares
end
def test_sum_of_squares_5
skip
assert_equal 55, Squares.new(5).sum_of_squares
end
def test_sum_of_squares_100
skip
assert_equal 338_350, Squares.new(100).sum_of_squares
end
def test_difference_of_squares_1
skip
assert_equal 0, Squares.new(1).difference
end
def test_difference_of_squares_5
skip
assert_equal 170, Squares.new(5).difference
end
def test_difference_of_squares_100
skip
assert_equal 25_164_150, Squares.new(100).difference
end
# Problems in exercism evolve over time, as we find better ways to ask
# questions.
# The version number refers to the version of the problem you solved,
# not your solution.
#
# Define a constant named VERSION inside of the top level BookKeeping
# module, which may be placed near the end of your file.
#
# In your file, it will look like this:
#
# module BookKeeping
# VERSION = 1 # Where the version number matches the one in the test.
# end
#
# If you are curious, read more about constants on RubyDoc:
# http://ruby-doc.org/docs/ruby-doc-bundle/UsersGuide/rg/constants.html
def test_bookkeeping
skip
assert_equal 4, BookKeeping::VERSION
end
end
```

```
class Squares
def initialize(count)
@count = count
end
def square_of_sum
naturals.reduce(&:+) ** 2
end
def sum_of_squares
naturals.reduce { |result, n| result + n**2 }
end
def difference
square_of_sum - sum_of_squares
end
private
attr_reader :count
def naturals
1.upto(count)
end
end
module BookKeeping
VERSION = 4
end
```

A huge amount can be learned from reading other peopleâ€™s code. This is why we wanted to give exercism users the option of making their solutions public.

Here are some questions to help you reflect on this solution and learn the most from it.

- What compromises have been made?
- Are there new concepts here that you could read more about to improve your understanding?

Level up your programming skills with 3,449 exercises across 52 languages, and insightful discussion with our volunteer team of welcoming mentors.
Exercism is
**100% free forever**.

## Community comments

Removes a redundant iteration through naturals.

I like the idea of treating naturals as a data clump!

Ruby 2.4 introduced Enumerable#sum, which makes for a great replacement of #reduce when summing.

Thanks!

Yeah, I noticed that when seeing some other solutions. I don't have 2.4 locally so I'm not going to change it here, but I appreciate we can now use that ?